Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Mon 13/05/24 12:31:43 GMT |
Message # 88065.2 Subject: Re:Wetlook in family Date: Thu 31/03/22 22:30:07 GMT Name: Wetfan |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Yes, I miss those days too. The wetlook that (apparently) so many folks enjoy today is very different from what I did in the 70's, 80's and 90's - not to mention the excellent work done by folks in the 40's and 50's!. Somehow jeans, boots, dresses or skirt/blouse outfits without stockings and shoes seems to defeat the original purpose of wetlook; e.g., to get soaked FULLY and completely dressed. But back then the girls and I had a great time and I still enjoy going through some of the film strips from shoots that have yet to be scanned! |
In reply to Message (88065) Wetlook in family
By Wetfan - Wed 30/03/22 23:25:17 GMT Follow up to Ane's post last Sunday, I am really old, so fail to understand why this topic is so sensitive. Yes, we were told to not get our clothes (especially shoes, since they were made of genuine leather back then) wet, but when it happened everyone usually just got a laugh out of it. We took the same approach with our daughters. One time our 11 yr old came running home from school, tore through the house and jumped right in the pool, still wearing her saddle shoes, bobby sox, poodle skirt, blouse and sweater! When we asked her why, she said it was fun and went around telling her friends who all got a good laugh out of it. Both girls went in the pool fully clothed at other times, but there was NOTHING sexual about it, just good "clean" fun! |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.023 seconds to generate ]