Wetlook World Forum

One of the frustrating things about the world is that, of all the combinations that are possible, so few of them are available. You find this when looking for LED light bulbs. You can get pretty much any colour temperature somewhere, e.g. 2700K, 3000K, 3500K etc. You can get any amount of lumens (up to 2000 for GLS bulbs), any shape, any fitting … but if you just happen to want a 3000 or 3200K, GLS, B22, 2000 lumen bulb … good luck with that. There seems to be no megastore, and every supplier only carries a small subset with limited if any useful filtering, and Google tends to hand back bogus results. (Google search results for computer monitors is worse: ask Google Shopping for a given size or resolution and it offers you any model it can find that does not match what you asked for.)

Fetishes work out the same, and the way fetish material works, there is no “fetish megastore” where you can filter by the model’s ethnicity, age, figure, hair colour, clothing type etc. regardless of producer.

Plenty of crossovers don’t exist or are far too rare. For example, there is plenty of regular erotica and porn involving naturally hairy women, but that is virtually nonexistent in wetlook, which is a real shame — you’ll never see hairy legs or armpits, and seeing pubes through (or poking out from) underwear is virtually nonexistent. If you’re looking for a natural look (no make-up) that will limit you again. Even outfits seem to slot into particular buckets. Dresses are common, but they fit particular patterns, and are more likely to be party dresses or formal dresses, than “girl next door” casual dresses. I don’t care for sleeveless dresses, but that is pretty much all you get. As I get older, the young age of models is getting more and more implausible for me!

What is also rare is outfits that look modest dry, and really clingy wet (especially braless). By this I mean clothes that conform to the figure: tight clothes actually hide the figure, while loose clothes can cling around it. The problem with a lot of productions is that clothes that reveal the shape of boobs when wet, already do so when dry, and I like the idea of modest clothes that look normal, becoming revealing when wet, in particular when there was no plan to get wet (e.g. spontaneous swimming, or a sudden rainstorm). It’s surprisingly hard to get spontaneously soaked in rain even in Britain!

I doubt anything will change — wetlook is too niche a market to find the full range of possible combinations.

As for “polished” — I don’t think that it’s necessarily the styling or quality, but the models tend to look too … Well, put it another way, I am more attracted to women with interesting characteristics, especially face shape. I like to see something special in their eyes. Erik Elsas is a good example of a producer who doesn’t choose “Hollywood” face shapes — he has lots of “girl next door” types.

Unfortunately for me, I am attracted the most by brains—intelligence, imagination, a complex soul—and wetlook scenes seldom offer that kind of insight! Wetlook scenes are just a mechanical “get wet” process, and in person I think I would care less about the outfit and more that I was getting wet with someone special … something that will never happen.