Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sun 12/05/24 18:52:26 GMT |
Message # 84172.1 Subject: Re:FAO Dima/Wetlooker, Wetlooker show question - why not in production order? Date: Wed 17/02/21 13:44:43 GMT Name: Dima Email: dima@wetlooker.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Hello, Mike!
The nature of our sets order is very clear. When we upload a bunch of new sets to the website, they are shuffling automatically and they fulfil our calendar. So, that’s why these sets in a random order there, but all of them will be appear one day. Sometimes I move sets manually but in very rare cases, because it is very hard to do in our CMS system. |
In reply to Message (84172) FAO Dima/Wetlooker, Wetlooker show question - why not in production order?
By MikeyPHX - Wed 17/02/21 01:19:41 GMT Dear Dima,
we seem to be getting WetlookerShow updates totally out of order, with update s001 just now, and update s008 3 updates ago and update s002 still missing (per set names). The 5th posted, but 8th and last per set numer s008 update seemed to show a modified new show format, with WAM added to water and some lottery. I really don't want to criticize, but I'm insanely curious about what is in store for s009, s010 etc and also very interested why this show (which got some backlash, and many ideas etc) was posted out of order. While this does not matter for regular sets, it matters a lot for ideas like the WetlookerShow. So as just a humble customer, I can barely ask you this, but could you please post the s002 update soon (I guess cause backlog) and the new s009, s010 etc, after, as the show is clearly evolving and it being posted out of order sadly caused backlash even here, so with a concept so unique among sets, I'd really recommend keeping them in order, as it's, well a show, not a set, and show episodes are published (and evolve) in order 99% of the time.
Regards, Mike
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.056 seconds to generate ]