Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 11/05/24 06:56:55 GMT |
Message # 81429.9 Subject: Re:producers pictures! Date: Sun 31/05/20 17:57:38 GMT Name: AdiWet |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I can only reply on Wamderland as she is the only one I buy from, mostly because she has new Adidas clothing and overall new an modern wardrobe.
Yes the pictures are not the best, light is bad (sometimes you canīt see any details at all). Video is lacking the same faults. To bad as she do stuff I like and she would benefit from better light and better pictures.
But i also would like to say most or almost every wetlook producers should take not from NON wetlook producers wet art photos. This are way better than any of the wetlook producers work.
An arty photographer who make wet photos actually makes really great and sexy stuff, more intriguing, more beautiful photos. They are not afraid to make photos with expensive clothing and environments. Well they are the best producers of wet photos imho. |
In reply to Message (81429) producers pictures!
By Anonymous - Fri 22/05/20 17:05:41 GMT Producers photo review.
Please keep in mind that I don't want to disencourage any producer, I only investigated briefly the pictures and made a list with some experiences.
Eurowam 1200x1600 72 dpi
Overal lightning ok, sharp, correcty white balance, focus is ok, also uses low f-stop from time to time to emphases the subject, correctly edited pictures. Only some higher resultion can be appriciated.
Wetlooker 1950x1303 72 dpi
Lighted by harsh flash, whitebalance differs from picture to picture (clothes can change color before being wet). I doubt if there is any editing here. some rubish pictures with closed eyes and incorrect focus are also in the list. Less could be more ...
Erik 1202x1800 240 dpi
Pictures are sharp and correctly focused, shots portrait most of time. Also uses a save F-stop to control sharpness. Whitebalance is ok in the whole set. the dpi allows you to enlarge the pictures
waminstyle 1373x2064 96 dpi
Sometimes I am confused about the focus point, some harsh shadows. Lightning could be better. Whitebalance is correct. very uncommon resolution though
Wamderland 2700x1800 72dpi
These are snapshots. There is actually no real style to comment here. I don't think that the foto's are edited in some way. Mostly distubed by the unbalanced horizon.
wetfoto 3240x2160 300 dpi
Light is sometimes bit overdone with loose of some detail, whitebalance is correct and pictures are in focus. Highest pictures quality of all.
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.012 seconds to generate ]