Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 02/05/24 21:44:45 GMT |
Message # 52652.3 Subject: Re:OT=Sorry folks... Date: Sun 11/12/11 19:36:45 GMT Name: AnthonyX Email: anthonyx@jowc.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I'm a "heathen non-believer", but I've also considered it in questionable taste to post baptism pics/clips on the wetlook forums. I guess it makes me a bit of a hypocrite because I enjoy them on an aesthetic/erotic level the same as a lot of other folks.
I like messylaura's take about the girl just caught in the rain on the way home becoming an object of someone's sexual interest. Arguably the same could be said of anyone going to the beach and deciding to take a dip still wearing their everyday clothes, or someone spontaneously going into a fountain for either a cool-off on a hot day or just a lark. When captured as either still image or video from a bystander's perspective, it pretty much encompasses all of candid wetlook.
We keep coming back to that same question of where to draw the line, and we're all drawing it in different places.
Maybe the question to be asked is this: is anyone connected with the images in question (including any subjects appearing in them and the person operating the camera) harmed in any way by a person either deriving some "guilty pleasure" from viewing it or circulating it to other people to do the same?
|
In reply to Message (52652) OT=Sorry folks...
By Sponge14U - Sun 11/12/11 16:50:40 GMT ...but i can get REALLY mad,if religion and sexual content ist mixed up. Maybe i am wrong,and no one else feels offended by *baptism*-postings. Then just erase my postings and carry on-Nigel. i won't wach any more.
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.001 seconds to generate ]