Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 03/05/24 01:29:29 GMT |
Message # 51046.4.1.1.1 Subject: Re:Unsortable galleries with many pics vs tubes of girls with age in profie! Date: Wed 20/07/11 16:24:22 GMT Name: Hans |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Here (lurking mostly) since 2003, so I'm well aware and a big fan of Rumpel's contribs as well.
And let's not suggest age in a profile is the all-determining factor, as there are plenty of 14 yo with profiles listing them as 19 or 21.
|
In reply to Message (51046.4.1.1) Unsortable galleries with many pics vs tubes of girls with age in profie!
By Mahoney - Wed 20/07/11 16:05:46 GMT When you link to gigantic galleries of hundreds of photos you can't sort them by hand. When you post individual Youtubes with age information in profiles you can...
BTW: Hans, you haven't been here long I can see. Pepe has posted some good links - true. But Rumpel is the real king of Candid Wetlook. He posted more links then anyone and to sites that are very hard to find (you have to search in strange languages etc.). If anyone should be cut some slack as far as rules are concerned it should be Rumpel. He is the only poster here that can be called the king of candid wetlook. Pepe posted a lot, sure, but he'd have to post about a thousand more tubes to give the community the same amount of material.
|
In reply to Message (51046.4.1) Double standards...
By Hans - Wed 20/07/11 15:54:42 GMT I'm with Pepe on this one....here's a guy that's posted hundreds of quality links for months and gets slapped because a few times he's missed the mark (or didn't read the profile). On the other hand, a good trove of hundreds of pictures of mostly teenagers is posted and there's applause and back-slapping from the group and little mention of the young ones. Little wonder Pepe's confused and feeling unmotivated.
I for one prefer to use my own sense of judgement. I know what appeals to me and what doesn't. If I download or see a pic that doesn't appeal to me because the subject is too young, I simply delete it and move on with life without screaming "pedo!" at the original poster. This isn't a hard-core site with nudity, and if those images ever appeared I would expect Nigel to act swiftly to correct the problem. |
In reply to Message (51046.4) Here are many pictures of girls under 16 years. And nobody says anything
By pepevilluela - Wed 20/07/11 14:44:25 GMT I'm the one who is criticized. How much hypocrisy |
In reply to Message (51046) Russian Flashmob-Partys Over 1000 Pictures and more
By Rumpel - Wed 20/07/11 08:53:34 GMT http://vkontakte.ru/albums-26460183 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-11674467 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-13181050 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-11926262 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-17394708 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-9469395 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-18940472 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-28088035 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-19300652 http://vkontakte.ru/albums-18922108 Scroll down and change the language
Forum http://wamclub.f.qip.ru/?1-1-0-00000001-000-10001-0
http://best-3-0.livejournal.com/748704.html
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.001 seconds to generate ]