Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 04/05/24 10:01:07 GMT |
Message # 40077.1 Subject: Re: No images of children (under 16) of any sort, or discussion thereof. Date: Mon 11/05/09 15:27:19 GMT Name: regenman |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Nigel: I fully understand that you want to stay on the safe side, prompting you to clear up the rules and remove the offending threads. In supplying this forum you've done more than your share for the wetlook community. You have no obligation to blur any margins and take heat for it - which you certainly would.
It's a pity though that an essentially harmless discussion has to end in such extreme measures. |
In reply to Message (40077) No images of children (under 16) of any sort, or discussion thereof.
By Nigel - nigel@wetlook.com Mon 11/05/09 13:42:49 GMT Website: www.wetlook.com 2 Wetlook Definitions and Rules of Acceptability and Behaviour 2.6 No images of children (under 16) of any sort, or discussion thereof.
I have just banned several people under this rule. This topic is now closed.
I am currently re-writing this rule for all those thick as shit people who can't understand this !!!
2.6 No images of children (under 16) of any sort, or discussion about or relating to children or their activities.
Please report any breaches of the rules to me, and I will immediately act upon them.
Nigel Forum Admin
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.065 seconds to generate ]