Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 04/05/24 10:05:28 GMT |
Message # 29298.7 Subject: Webshots! Or Flickr, or... Date: Fri 25/05/07 07:04:30 GMT Name: Rob |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Smugmug or any other (high res) photo site.
For me, videos in general are not interesting because of their low resolution /this even goes for DVD quality videos). And the quality of those stupid flash videos from youtube (as well as Google, myscpace etc.) is even much worse. |
In reply to Message (29298) webshots vs youtube: poll
By francescowet - francescowet@libero.it Thu 24/05/07 06:00:16 GMT Since several months, togheter with the well famous webshots wetlook images (called also wetshots), we have also a lot of video by youtube and similar and this forum is full of both webshots and youtube (in the last period more youtube and similar than webshots). I would like to make a poll: in your opinion are better 'wetshots' photos or youtube video? Wetshots have the advantage that in the most cases have a very good resolution that allow to see a lot of details but are static photos and does not allow to 'see the whole scene'. Instead youtube video allow us to see the whole scene (expecially the candid ones of people trown into the water) but the resolution is always bad.
In my opionion photos are better because allow us to imagine what was happened and the better quality is more exciting.
I'm also interested in your opinion. Do you prefer wetshots or youtube?
Best regards
Francescowet
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.320 seconds to generate ]