Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 04/05/24 09:13:56 GMT |
Message # 71575.3.1.1.1.1 Subject: Re:availability of candid Date: Tue 17/10/17 12:03:33 GMT Name: Ant Email: ton9159466@aol.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
That is exactly right!! I love wetlook 'cause it's naughty but if it's normal to swim clothed then it's not naughty but becomes ordinary and not sexy |
In reply to Message (71575.3.1.1.1) availability of candid
By Silas - Sat 14/10/17 11:59:50 GMT Seems like there is a tremendous amount of available candid wetlook of non-white cultures, who do not see getting wet in clothing as taboo. East Indian, Southeast Asian, and Latino cultures have thousands of videos online of people getting wet in clothing for one reason or another, and any kind of clothing, from casual to formal. Perhaps the western taboo of getting wet in clothing is part of what drives the fetish, hence, you have to create posed wetlook with paid models to attain it in great numbers. Seems that the "unattainable" aspect of a western, white, upper class woman getting soaked in clothing adds to the thrill - perhaps even creates it in the first place. If you grow up surrounded by girls and women who have no qualms about getting wet in clothing at any time, it wouldn't be the naughty thrill that we experience as the wetlook fetish.
|
In reply to Message (71575.3.1.1) The 'wetclothinggirls' family still includes non-white models though
By jollywetfellow - Sat 14/10/17 11:46:24 GMT The 6 girls on the current Wetclothinggirls front page include "latina Bruna" and "Indian Sarah", and the 6 on the current front page of Premium Wetclothinggirls include "dark Pamela" and "Nicha in a traditional Indian dress". That seems a pretty good proportion. Perhaps others could follow suit.....
|
In reply to Message (71575.3.1) Re:How about this?
By MikeyABQ - Sat 14/10/17 10:55:00 GMT Is that site still updated regularly? I thought they abandonned it some years back, when they downsized the „wetclothinggirls” family?
Because the updates section doesn’t actually give any dates, unlike their main sites |
In reply to Message (71575.3) How about this?
By Jan - Sat 14/10/17 09:55:19 GMT http://www.blackwetlook.com/index.htm |
In reply to Message (71575) Is the wetlook community racist? 99,9 percent models are white...
By MikeyABQ - Fri 13/10/17 21:33:42 GMT OK, this question will not go down well. I've raised it in the ripping discussion, but nobody would touch it. But it bothers me... and I hope the mods will not delete this
I know the wetlook community is mainly based in the US and Europe and people often like to see the girl next door type, but...
Statistically white dudes also like the exotic beauties. Yet it seems not to be the case in the wetlook community. Or is it only among wetlook producers?
I'm going straight into a mine field here, as I will not name names (except positive or justified examples), but actually it's easy to see who is generally NOT representing their countries population...
I fully understand that producers from the Ukraine and Russia (both model and candid) don't really have a choice in skin color, though there are still some (mainly Asian) models present
WetRom is also doing a good job in getting a bit darker skin toned girls in (at least one of his stars must have Roma (gypsy) blood in her), so no discrimination there.
However things get iffy when we go further west and to North America.
I mean kudos to Erik Elsas, he seems to be trying for some diversity.
But as for most producers, from countries which are only say 60-70 percent white, well it seems they represented are whiter than Poland or Lithuania, as virtually all models seem to be white Caucasian.
Why is that? I mean I know there were some sites dedicated to black (or other women of color) wetlook, but that was a long time ago. Some sites dedicated to Asian models/candids still exist (as do some Asian by origin sites), but also few.
So I wonder, will you discuss a more serious topic? It's between shoes or no shoes, summer or winter clothing, ripping or no ripping, messy or no messy here. But are you up for a more serious discussion?
The question is are many well known wetlook producers racist? Or the wetlook public for some reason? Because this fetish seems to be 99.9% about white girls. Yet the whole industry in the West is definitely not. Even Tainster/AllWam has more diversity despite being based in Czechia.
And no, I don't want to stir controversy. I just like seeing Asian and darker skinned women in wetlook. I mean I like the more Western dress type, as in some tropical countries, they just wear to little clothes, but you know, there is this one dude, from the UK, who posts candids from English beaches. Non-white girls (dressed in western ways) seem to be the majority there... And this is practically the only consistent source for such photos.
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.019 seconds to generate ]