Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 11/05/24 13:07:36 GMT |
Message # 17276.4 Subject: Re: NYC beaches Date: Sun 24/07/05 01:58:49 GMT Name: closetwetlookloverinnyc |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Yep - the outdoor showers at the Coney Island Beach always have people washing the sand off their bodies - and/or their clothes in many cases. I was there two weeks ago. Only saw one or two fully clothed wet women - but they sure looked nice.
In defense of Sammy - I'll say that being too poor to afford a camera is probably newyorkeuse for "I don't want to get my butt kicked by that hot wet girl's boyfriend or Dad"...
Truth be told - I'll surf the web looking for pictures of wet women. I'll go run into a river/lake/pool in my clothes privately or take a clothed shower/bath. And I'm always up for a jump in if I encounter women willing to get wet (doesn't happen so often).
BUT - I think the day I go to the beach for no purpose other than to wetlook site-see - might be the day I've crossed a line from fettish to obsession... There are so many other healthier things to do with one's time... |
In reply to Message (17276) NYC beaches
By Sammy - Sat 23/07/05 06:49:51 GMT Anyone else in the area been to the beaches in New York City lately? There's often some good wetlook going on...particularly Hindu and Muslim women who cannot wear bathing suits and, sometimes, even some Orthodox Jewish women who go in the water in long skirts. Coney Island seems to be the best spot, I think because in addition to the reasons above people come for the rides/food and if it's a hot day might end up in the sea in clothes to cool off. Brighton Beach (right up the shore from Coney) and Rockaway (in Queens, though a very long subway ride from Manhattan) aren't quite as good, but still worth a visit. Too bad I'm too poor to afford a camera or I would snap some pics... |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.008 seconds to generate ]