![]() Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Tue 25/03/25 00:48:27 GMT | ![]() |
Message # 67013.2.1 Subject: Date: Sat 09/04/16 09:59:48 GMT Name: MikeyPhX |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
![]() |
Some people care for the beauty of the girls the most, and Dima has fantastic models in many types. Other want some specific type of clothing which is never foind elsewhere (for example shorts with pantyhose, common in Russian candids, which dried up, nonexistant on pay-sites except that one). Also some people just don't care about "Super High Definition Retina 7K out of this world display". People who have been around here longer, still miss lost photos from the 90s which were worse quality than Instagram in th 640x640 age, sometimes by half. My favorite Dima videos are among the most watched I have, despite not being HD, while most in my collection are. |
In reply to Message (67013.2) ![]() By Karl -
Why Dima should change anything, you are buying it any way.
I remember all the lessons and advices of the specialists some weeks ago. The promises, what will be changed and how everything will be improved.
The leak of quality you already see in the 3 to 4 sample pics on his homepage. I would be a shame presenting these low quality pics as samples, so the rest of the set can only be more worth. Why paying for that? |
In reply to Message (67013) ![]() By SoakingSteve -
Has anybody purchased any of the "new and revised" wetlooker sets? I see some that look like they could be promising. My only hold up is, I bought some sets a while back and was very disappointed. It was pretty much wasted money. I really do not want to buy them and get the same as before: blurry shots, 50+ shots of the same pose in the pool. Any input would he greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
[ This page took 0.005 seconds to generate ]