Wetlook World Forum

The other main difference is that candid videos are innocent, while Pixel may brand the videos as games and fun, but they are sexually styled and are clearly fetish videos. And youtube has deleted their channel (which always comes back) at least twice already. While youtube does not delete candid fountain videos, as only one of these types is sexualized and it’s the Pixel games.

I think the rule of thumb is to not post anything underaged when the girls age is known, like stuff from social media, people’s yt channels etc, where the age is usually clearly stated. The when in doubt rule would mean basically NO candids at all as SOMEONE will always have doubts, depending on the persons mindset. There are some YT challenge videos of guessing peoples age. And the results are funny. The thing is if someone wants to see underaged everywhere he can even have doubts about 20 something year olds. Look even at actresses. Some (say Emma Roberts, Miranda Cosgrove, Sarah Hyland etc etc) are cast to play teens years after they stopped being teens and actually many people are fooled. So the when in doubt rule as in anyones doubt will mean no candids as someone will always have doubts (especially people who have daughters and see them as eternal children, some older people out of touch with how youths now look and a group of sjws of the worst sort). They’ll flag even college students as underaged. So who should be the judge? Why do you suggest the most extreme members of the public? Why not the uploader, admin or credit card processor. The sites showing stuff you call underaged used well established processors like CCBill and Verotel. These companies tend to kick out producers who break the law and they are also Ok with the videos. So why should the most extreme people be the judges? Do you really want and Internet Saudi Arabia and censorship? The uploader, the forum admin and the credit card processor are good enough judges and they do take action if something is illegal. Just the fact that you and a couple very active people who protest many posts (but are few) see underaged even in 18-20 year olds, does not give them the right to be judges.