 Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 27/04/24 23:03:20 GMT Translate page FROM Translate page TO | 
|
Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 27/04/24 23:03:20 GMT Translate page FROM Translate page TO |
|
|
Message # 6639.3 Subject: Date: Wed 29/10/03 02:39:24 GMT Name: AnthonyX Email: anthonyx@jowc.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
|
|
As you say, Ray, there is an undeniable erotic aspect to wetlook. I think it simply comes back to the distinction between erotica and porn. For some people, there is no distinction and even the hint of a nipple through a tight top is pornographic. I suppose I have a more liberal view as follows:
See-through is erotic; transparent might as well be nude. Total nudity (although not wetlook) is not necessarily porn... it depends on the pose. Spread-legged close-ups of a woman's parted labia are well beyond the realm of simple erotica (and this forum).
I suppose I've grown to tolerate a certain amount of porn for the sake of the wetlook mixed in. I think those are the porn-links-with-wetlook-hooks you refer to.
Perhaps for the sake of the forum, we need to be a bit more discriminating about what constitutes erotic wetlook and what is out-and-out porn; especially since there is so much wetlook out there now... there should be no need to go rummaging through porn sites to find the occasional interesting wetlook picture.
|
In reply to Message (6639)  What direction? Please respond!
By ray -
ray_diaz1@yahoo.com
Website: www.wetfreespirit.org I wonder what direction the folks that visit this forum want? Rule number 6 clearly states "no porn" but this forum is inundated with porn site links now. The porn sites are using the members here to pump more visitors and presumably cash into their porn web sites. The most recent poster has on her front page....and I quote
"full on XXX Hardcore Pictures and Videos including: Girl/Girl,Girl/Guy/Girl,Guy/Girl/Guy,Group Sex,Blowjobs Facials,Anal Play,Masturbation (with and without toys) And much, much more ……. In fact, there’s not much I won’t do!!! Come see for yourself"
Is this the direction you want this forum to go? I personally want to see wetlook, not porn. I am posting some wetlook pictures below to further emphasize my point. These pictures are what wetlook on this forum use to be about or what I think it use to be about.
I would suggest if these people are into wetlook and want to post wetlook pictures, then separate them from the porn and offer links to those pages without pushing the porn.
Julie and I are not stupid and we know the sexual connection with wetlook, but this forum seems to be turning into a porn forum with wetlook as a hook. We already have UMD.NET as a ready source of porn links, do we really need to have this forum duplicate that?
So hopefully there will be some good replies to my question...
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
|
Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
[ This page took 0.018 seconds to generate ]
-> TO
Re: direction - wetlook yes, porn no
Wed 29/10/03 02:16:58 GMT