Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 04/05/24 09:58:37 GMT |
Message # 5208.6.2 Subject: Re: Re: To BRA or not to BRA, that is the question Date: Sat 09/08/03 16:15:32 GMT Name: Yeahuno |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I like women in no bra at all. |
In reply to Message (5208.6) Re: To BRA or not to BRA, that is the question
By Bud - Sat 09/08/03 15:24:34 GMT Depends. Generally I like wetlook with a sexy lace bra. I'm a dressy wetlook fan, I like a blouse that goes sheer over a sexy lace bra that I can try to get a look through. It's partly the naughty aspect. Well, and fully dressed, is naughtier. Braless usually isn't fully dressed, it's a dissapointment. On the other hand, big padded bras are a bummer too. I'd rather see smaller breasts through a thin layer of lace than a couple of big rubber pads.
Now a backless evening dress, meant to be worn braless, is maybe the ulitmate, fully dressed and braless :).
A T shirt and Jeans is what I wear to fix the car or do yard work, who cares if that stuff gets wet. Doesn't do much for me. |
In reply to Message (5208) To BRA or not to BRA, that is the question
By ILikeHerWet - Sat 09/08/03 12:50:19 GMT Hi all, back from a well deserved holiday
Today I would like to initiate a discussion on bras (or not) in wetlook. Which do you prefer and why?? Do any of you like both (with and without) equally? Do you think there is a relationship between preferring bras and preferring the wetlook subject to stay clothed?
For my own preference, I am in the no bra camp. To me, it seems ashamed to hide a beautiful woman's body any more than necessary. So for me, part of what works in wetlook is the clothes clinging directly to a woman's boobs. I guess I feel a bra simply 'interferes' with the wetlook experience.
But I know there are many varied opinions out there.....what is yours.....? Thanks in advance!
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.011 seconds to generate ]